Exclusivity vs Non-Exclusivity
Last updated: February 2025
Quick Comparison
| Aspect | Exclusivity Clause | Non-Exclusivity Clause |
|---|---|---|
| Restriction | Limits dealing with other parties | No restrictions on other relationships |
| Commitment | Higher commitment from both sides | Lower commitment; either side can diversify |
| Competition law risk | Higher; may need legal review under the Competition Act 1998 | Lower; generally no competition concerns |
| Negotiating leverage | Often commands better terms or pricing | Less leverage to negotiate preferential terms |
| Flexibility | Restricted; locked into one partner for the defined scope | Maximum flexibility to pursue alternatives |
What Is a Exclusivity Clause?
A contractual provision restricting one or both parties from engaging with competitors or alternative providers for a defined scope and period.
Key Features
- • Restricts dealing with competitors or alternative parties
- • Must be limited in scope, duration, and geography to be enforceable
- • Common in distribution, licensing, and service agreements
- • May attract scrutiny under UK competition law
Best For
- • Protecting significant investments in a relationship
- • Securing dedicated capacity or priority service
- • Distribution agreements for premium or niche products
What Is a Non-Exclusivity Clause?
A contractual provision confirming that either or both parties are free to engage with competitors and alternative providers.
Key Features
- • Both parties free to work with others
- • No restrictions on competing relationships
- • Reduces dependency on any single partner
- • Lower risk of competition law issues
Best For
- • Maintaining flexibility to work with multiple partners
- • Low-commitment or early-stage relationships
- • Markets where multiple providers enhance resilience
When to Use a Exclusivity Clause
Use exclusivity when you need a committed partner, are making significant investments in the relationship, or are granting valuable rights such as territorial distribution. Ensure the scope and duration are reasonable.
When to Use a Non-Exclusivity Clause
Use non-exclusivity as the default position unless there is a strong commercial reason for exclusivity. This maintains flexibility and avoids competition law risks.
Which Does Your Business Need?
Default to non-exclusivity unless there is a clear commercial case for exclusivity. If you grant or accept exclusivity, ensure it is limited in duration and scope, includes performance benchmarks, and has been reviewed for competition law compliance.
FAQ
Are exclusivity clauses enforceable under UK law?
Yes, provided they are reasonable in scope, duration, and geography. However, they must also comply with the Competition Act 1998 and may be void if they have an appreciable anti-competitive effect on the market. Seek legal advice for significant exclusivity arrangements.
Can I negotiate a break clause in an exclusivity arrangement?
Yes. It is good practice to include performance benchmarks or minimum order commitments. If the exclusive partner fails to meet these, you can terminate the exclusivity or the agreement entirely.
Generate the right contract instantly
AccountsOS generates UK-compliant contracts tailored to your needs. From £10/month.
Get Started FreeThis is guidance for UK businesses, not legal advice. Consult a solicitor for complex matters.
View all comparisons